NATIONAL
WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER: Reich Orders EPA to Reinstate Scientist
DIRECTORY:
FAN
>
Health
>
Cancer
>
NTP
Study > News
National Whistleblower Center
February 10, 1994
Reich Orders EPA to Reinstate Scientist
Extends Jurisdiction of Environmental Whistleblower Laws to
EPA Employees
by Herb Ettel
In a precedent-setting
ruling, U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Secretary Robert
B. Reich has ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to reinstate toxicologist Dr. William L. Marcus.
Labor found the EPA guilty of falsifying employment records,
discrimination, and retaliation against an employee whistleblower.
It also granted Marcus the largest compensatory damage award
ever upheld under the federal environmental employee protection
statutes.
"This ruling extends, for the first time, the whistleblower
protections of the federal environmental statutes to EPA employees,"
said Stephen M. Kohn, chairperson of the National Whistleblower
Center and Marcus' attorney. "It's the most significant
case to date for an environmental whistleblower within the EPA.
The precedent is equally applicable to all federal employees."
"I've been vindicated," said Marcus, an 18-year veteran
at EPA. The decision upheld an earlier
order by a DOL administrative law judge (ALJ) issued Dec.
3, 1992, supporting Marcus' claim that he was fired for protected
activity. Marcus filed his complaint under the six major federal
environmental statutes and their applicable regulations: Clean
Air, Clean Water, Toxic Substances, Solid Waste, Safe Drinking
Water and Superfund.
The EPA dismissed the 52-year-old toxicologist on May 13, 1992,
after a four year investigation of Marcus' outside activities
as an expert trial witness. EPA accused Marcus of improper use
of agency information for private gain, being improperly absent
from work, and engaging in outside employment which appeared
to pose a conflict of interest.
The charges were brought as a result of an investigation by
the EPA Inspector General (IG). Marcus observed, "The IG
initiated its investigation after complaints were voiced by
a large chemical company (Velsicol Chemical Corp.) in April
of 1988." Both the ALJ and Reich found many of the charges
to be "unsubstantiated," and based on apparently falsified
time records and other testimony.
Reich disputed the EPA's position, stating, "I agree with
the ALJ that this rationale is pretextual and that the true
reason for the discharge was retaliation." Both
Reich and the ALJ found that Marcus was actually fired for publicly
criticizing and opposing EPA's policy on fluoride
in drinking water.
In addition to "reinstatement to his former or comparable
position," Reich ordered EPA to offer Marcus the same compensation,
terms, conditions and privileges of his former employment.
"My family suffered mightily," Marcus said. "How
can the public be protected when people charged with that mission
are afraid that telling an unpopular truth results in their
firing?"
The National Whistleblower Center, created in 1988, is a non-
profit, tax exempt organization. The center supports precedent-
setting litigation on behalf of employee whistleblowers, provides
legal advice and referrals for counsel to whistleblowers nationwide
and educates the public about the rights of employees to make
disclosures regarding corporate or government misconduct, environmental
protection or health and safety violations.
(See
Secretary of Labor's Decision and Order, February 7, 1994)