HEALTH EFFECTS:
Interview with Dr. William Marcus (EPA)
DIRECTORY: FAN
> Health
> Cancer
> NTP
Study > Interview with EPA's Dr. William Marcus
The following is an interview with Dr.
William Marcus, Senior Science Advisor in EPA's Office
of Drinking Water, concerning the National Toxicology Program's
animal study on fluoride & cancer.
The interview is with Dr. Gary Null, and was aired on Null's radio
show (program #310) on March 10, 1995. For more info, call (212)
799-1246.
Marcus: When I got a hold of the contractor report
and reviewed it very carefully, not only was it reporting cancers
in the animals, [it was reporting] osteosarcomas
which bothered me a lot because I've been trying to produce osteosarcomas
in animals for almost 20 years and the only luck I ever had was
with an experiment in dogs and monkeys, and the osteosarcomas took
nearly the lifetime of the animals, and we were using radium which
specifically produces that in bones. And here we have a compound
commonly available - fluoride - that did it in rats in two
years or less. That was upsetting to begin with. Secondarily...in
that same study, there were cancers of the
liver that are very rare according to the board certified veterinary
pathologist at the contractor, Battelle. And those really were very
upsetting because they were hepatocholangiocarcinoma,
a very rare, rare, liver cancer... Something similar to that
occurred with vinyl chloride in a far less well conducted study
and it was determined that it was carcinogenic, highly carcinogenic.
And then there were several other kinds of cancers found in the
jaw and other places and I felt at the time that the report was
very, very interesting. It showed that the levels of the fluoride
that caused the cancers in the animals were actually lower than
those levels seen in people who are ingesting lower amounts but
for longer periods of time and that was very very worrisome.
It meant that the general population could be exposed to fluoride
known to cause cancer in animals and have levels near the cancer
being produced in the bones.
Gary Null: And what did you do and what happened?
Marcus: Well I went to a meeting that was held
in Research Triangle Park in April 1990, the latter part of April,
in which the NTP was presenting their review of the study. And I
went with several colleagues of mine, one of whom was a board certified
veterinary pathologist who had originally reported hepatocholangiocarcinoma
as a separate entity in rats and mice. I asked him if he would have
an opportunity to look at the slides to see if that really
was a tumor or the pathologist at Battelle had made an error and
he told me after looking at the slide that in fact it was correct.
And at the meeting every one of the cancers that was reported by
the contractor had been down-graded by
the NTP.
Now I've been in the toxicology business looking at studies of
this nature for nearly 25 years and I've never seen that; never
ever seen where every single endpoint that was a cancer endpoint
had been down-graded. I'd seen one or two endpoints argued over,
usually on a definition [of] what is a cancer in that particular
tissue. But I've never seen every one of them down-graded. I found
that very suspicious and I went to see an investigator in the Congress
at the suggestion of my friend Bob Carton. And this gentleman and
his staff investigated very thoroughly and found out that the scientists
at the NTP down at Research Triangle Park had been coerced
to change their findings.
Gary Null: Coerced by whom?
Marcus: I never really got that. But the only
people that can coerce them were their supervisors.
Gary Null: Why would they want to coerce them?
What were they trying, who or what were they trying to protect?
Marcus: Well as you well know fluoride is still recommended
as a treatment for prevention of dental caries, tooth decay, and
has been touted as such by the Public Health Service since 1953-54
and they ha[ve] a reputation to protect. It wouldn't do for
them to have been making this strong recommendation over the years
and now to find out that they have been exposing the general public
to a material known, now known, to be potentially carcinogenic in
humans. And there have been other studies..."
****
NOTE: Due to his criticisms of the tumor downgradings,
Dr. Marcus was fired by the EPA. The US Secretary
of Labor, Robert Reich, later ruled that EPA fired Marcus out of
"retaliation" for Marcus' stance on fluoride, and ordered
EPA to reinstate Marcus with full back pay and compensation. To
learn more about EPA's firing of Marcus, see:
|